So if the last post was called pers-patience, and it had to do with perspective and patience, then this post called persp-active must be something clever too right?
nope.
A lot of things are very different depending on where you choose to stand when looking at it. It took me a while to figure out what patience kinda means (as I will probably further change or develop that idea later on, so how I see things now is only at the time of writing. It wasn't until I actively thought about it, did I realize how mistaken I was. Which is what this post is about. The thingy between knowing something and starting to understand it. Knowing something means you can repeat it to someone else; however, understanding it means that you could explain it if needed.
Perspective is also tied to your attitude towards a situation, and as motivational posters around the world say, attitude determines altitude. For example, sparring can be approached in infinitely many ways. Some may see a competition, a situation where there is a winner and loser; whereas others may see it as a learning opportunity, where they can try to do the things they may not be so good at, and practice them in a controlled environment, with people they can trust not to hurt them if something doesn't work. That was the idea I got from Sifu this past tuesday. This made me think about my perspectives, not just about sparring, but about all the other aspects of my training.
This made me think that control as a concept is not really about pulling punches and kicks, but that control is an attitude, an attitude of precision and empathy, in that you do not want to hurt your training partners because you can only imagine how that would feel if the roles were reversed. As a result of not wanting to hurt your training partners, you will pull your punches and kicks, and anything you land is merely a tap, with no power and penetration behind the technique.
And that concept lead to the large pers-patience post previously. Which brought me back to how actively exploring the perspective of how you are seeing something is so important. Each different view on something comes with its own assumptions, and that only by actively analyzing what you see and where you are looking from, can we know what these assumptions are.
From the cook's perspective, he is merely chopping cucumbers for a salad. But if you ask the cucumber, I think it would think very very differently.
I find that sometimes I have to actively imagine how things would seem from someone else's vantage point, and I find that this helps me understand the situation better, see things I didn't previously, or simply make obvious the assumptions I was unknowingly accepting.
I think this video illustrates this point beautifully: